All case studies

Reducing setup time by 40% without investment

Short runs were quoted at a loss because setup was averaged across all jobs instead of charged to the job that caused it.

Case study engine
Figures derived from the shared calculation kernel

Reducing setup time by 40% without investment

Eight weeks of process work, no purchase order, 13.5 press hours recovered per month and short-run margin from 9% to 23%.

Business
Promotional and merch printing
Volume
16,500 impressions / month across 74 jobs
Employees
9
Equipment
1 automatic 8-colour press, 1 manual carousel
Country
Netherlands

Investment

none

Cash benefit / month

1.850 €

Payback

0.0 months

ROI (36 mo)

Before / after

MetricBeforeAfterDirection
Average setup28 min17 minlower is better
Registration share13 min5 minlower is better
Press hours in setup / month34.5 h21.0 hlower is better
Short-run gross margin9%23%higher is better
Test garments per setup62lower is better

Lessons learned

  • Measure before you buy: the shop had been quoting a second press.
  • Charge setup to the job that causes it, otherwise short runs subsidise nothing visible.
  • Process gains stick only when the new time becomes the standard costing input.

Pitfalls

  • Recovered hours only count as cash because the shop actually sold them.
  • Averaging setup across all jobs hid the loss on every run below 100 pieces.

Recreate this case with your own numbers

Prefills 74 jobs per month, the 28 → 17 minute setup change and the registration split of the recorded setups.

Related articles

Knowledge Center